Saturday, October 20, 2007

Fred Thompson at the Family Research Council Summit


Overall, I think Thompson was strong, but uneven before the Family Research Council Summit.

The parts of Thompson’s speech that work, work well. The problem is that there are stretches in between them that – I must have used this term a hundred times already when writing about Thompson – meander. He begins with a funny, lighthearted story about his 2-year-old daughter Hayden clinging to his leg during a speech at an Iowa event.

He gets significant warmth from the crowd when he declares, “We know that our basic rights come from God, and not any form of government.” His “we have shed more blood” line gets significant applause.

The economics portions of Thompson's speech get something of a blah reception. Around this time, I noticed he clears his throat more often than any other politician I've seen. Somebody get this man a cough drop.* “When we see government officials giving birth control to 11-year-olds, we know some values are seriously messed up.”

He gets a long standing ovation when he says that in his first hour as president, he would “pray to God for the wisdom to know what is right.” The ovation is so long, that his true closing line, “and the strength to carry it out” feels like a forlorn orphan of a statement.

A bunch of young Fred-ites chant, “Go’Fred Go!” as he departs. Some great moments in his address, and since most will only see the highlights, he’s done most of what he needed to do. But we still haven’t seen him knock it out of the park, from the moment he steps up to the podium to the moment he departs. He’s an oddly uneven speaker for a veteran Senator and television star.

* A reader wonders if the throat-clearing is related to Thompson's lymphoma; a Thompsonite told me he didn't think so. I hope my observation didn't come across as a shot at Thompson's health.

Another Black Eye for the GOP?

RNC chairman abruptly resigns

The Miami Herald reported a few weeks ago that Sen. Mel Martinez (R-Fla.), elected chairman of the Republican National Committee in January, planned to step down once a GOP presidential nominee emerges. Martinez expected to make way for his successor some time in February, so the ‘08 nominee can have his team in place for the election season.

Apparently, he couldn’t wait that long. Martinez abruptly resigned today, less than a year after taking the job at the president’s request.

“I believe that our future as a party and nation is bright and I have every intention of continuing to fight for our president, our party and our candidates,” the Florida senator said in a statement.

Martinez said he was relinquishing the post to spend more time focusing on his constituents and because the RNC had achieved the objective he set when he assumed the job in January.

“It was my goal as general chairman to lead the party as it established the structure and raised the resources necessary to support our presidential candidate and ensure Republican victories next November. I believe we have accomplished those goals,” Martinez said.

Yes, it’s quite a record of accomplishments. There was the… well, how about the… who can forget about the time…. OK, Martinez seems to have neither set nor met any actual goals as RNC chairman.

But I am curious about why he’s stepping down now.

The AP reported:

His departure was abrupt. Martinez wasn’t expected to step down until a Republican presidential nominee was selected. The earliest that could occur is February. […]

There was no immediate word on a replacement.

I hate to sound cynical, but isn’t this a little odd? The RNC chairman planned to step down next year, but abruptly shifts course, making a Friday-afternoon announcement, usually a time reserved for political figures who are avoiding attention.

For that matter, there was supposed to be a transition, so Martinez could hand the reins off to his successor. Instead, there simply won’t be an RNC chairman until one of the Republican presidential candidates locks up the nomination, which won’t happen for at least four months.

Seems like there might be more to this one. Hmm.

Friday, October 19, 2007

Campaign Goes After Fred Thompson

October 19, 2007

Fred Thompson

So I'm at the Family Research Council Value Voters event, and the Fred Thompson campaign is putting out a flyer that rips Giuliani and Romney on the abortion issue.

Basically, they are using past quotes from both of them to say how they have been AWOL on the life issue for a long time. But a rival campaign is pushing back. They've provided to The Brody File a document from the past that they say shows how Thompson isn't so pure on the abortion issue either.

It's from The Tennessean newspaper in 1994. It's an election interview done during Thompson's run for the Senate.

Look at the document here and the transcription is below:

QUESTION: What is your position on abortion? What exceptions do you favor?

FRED THOMPSON: I do not believe abortions should be financed with taxpayers' money. I support the state's right to impose reasonable restrictions such as parental notification. The ultimate decision on abortion should be left with the women and not the government.

In that answer, you see Thompson's federalist streak. He wants the government to stay out. Also, his whole answer has some pro-life tendencies but that last line sounds very pro-choice.

Listen, Thompson voted solidly pro-life during his Senate term. But if he's going to claim conservative purity from the 90's until today, he needs to be ready for the other campaigns to knock him down a peg or two. Plus, if Thompson's campaign is going to put out these flyers at the Value Voters Summit, they might want to watch out for the incoming fire.

Why do I have a feeling my inbox is going to be filling up again. Oh, boy.

Republican Candidates Address Pro-Life Forum, John McCain Makes Case

Republican Candidates Address Pro-Life Forum, John McCain Makes Case

by Steven Ertelt
LifeNews.com Editor
October 19,
2007

Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- The leading Republican presidential candidates attended a key pro-life conference sponsored by the Family Research Council to highlight social issues such as abortions. While all of the candidates brought their "A game" to the event to reach pro-life voters, Arizona Sen. John McCain worked overtime to make his case.

McCain has been lagging in the polls and financially and appears less likely to win the nomination when compared with leaders such as Fred Thompson, Mitt Romney or Rudy Giuliani.

But he made an exceptionally personal and emotional appeal and tried to assure the thousands in attendance that he is strongly pro-life.

“I have been pro-life my entire political career,’’ McCain said. “I believe I am the only major candidate in either party that can make that claim."

"I am pro-life because I know what it is like to live without human rights. That is a personal testament that you need not take on faith. You need only examine my public record to know that I will not change my position," he added.

However, his personal record is what frustrates many pro-life advocates.

McCain has been a strong supporter of forcing taxpayers to fund embryonic stem cell research which requires the destruction of human life. He headed up the campaign finance bill that placed onerous restrictions on pro-life groups and some see him as shaky on abortion because he once skipped a vote on whether to endorse Roe v. Wade.

But, McCain called himself "very conservative" and said he would "appoint strict constructionist judges that won't legislate from the bench."

Meanwhile, Fred Thompson appear to make his pro-life views on both abortion and bioethics the hallmark of his day at the FRC forum.

His campaign distributed literature on his behalf touting his 100% pro-life voting record while he was a Tennessee senator and criticizing the record of Romney and Giuliani.

Mitt Romney appeared to go after Giuliani for backing abortion when he said that "We're not going to beat Hillary Clinton by acting like Hillary Clinton."

"I am pro-family on every level, from personal to political," he added.

Sam Brownback, the Kansas senator who appeared likely to drop out of the race on Friday, also attended the event and complained that pro-life advocates didn't rally behind his candidacy.

"I came to them with the cause, but I don't have the resources and the name," he said.



Printed from: http://www.lifenews.com/nat3387.html


Copyright © 2003-2006 LifeNews.com. All rights reserved. For free daily/weekly pro-life news, email us at news@LifeNews.com.

Perry Says He'll Help Giuliani Overturn Roe


(GALVESTON, Texas) — Facing criticism from key conservatives, Texas Gov. Rick Perry said he endorsed GOP presidential candidate Rudy Giuliani despite their philosophical differences because he believes the former mayor is the only Republican who could win in 2008.

Related Articles

Why Is Rudy Smiling?

Yes, the political rule book says a pro-choice former New York City mayor married to wife No. 3 cann...

Pro-Choice Convictions Overturned

The official position of the Republican Party on abortion is more extreme than most people realize. ...

Will Rudy‘s Get-Tough Image Backfire?

How many alleged criminals can a law-and-order candidate be associated with before it starts to hurt...

How The Right Went Wrong

A generation ago, fresh off the second biggest electoral landslide in American history, Ronald Reaga...

The election of Democratic candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton would be "devastating" to the economy, the military and to the anti-abortion movement, Perry told The Associated Press in an exclusive interview.

"Where is that perfect candidate? Is it one of the others? I think not," Perry said, in response to criticism that he was urging Republicans to settle for a candidate who doesn't completely represent their views.

Perry also said he has no interest in becoming vice president and would turn Giuliani down if he made such an offer.

"I would tell him that that is not an option that I am interested in discussing," Perry said. "I have a great job. Texas is where my heart is."

Perry, serving his second full term as governor, endorsed Giuliani in Washington on Wednesday and then campaigned with the former New York City mayor in Iowa later that day.

Giuliani has favored abortion rights and gun control, which Perry and other Texas conservatives ardently oppose.

"What is the result that they would like to see?" Perry said of anti-abortion activists. "It is that Roe v. Wade would be overturned and that that would fall back to the states. How does that happen? It happens when the next president of the United States appoints strict constructionists to the Supreme Court. Rudy Giuliani has looked me in the eye and told me that is what he will do."

Texas conservatives were outraged upon hearing Perry's choice. Two other conservative statewide office holders, Attorney General Greg Abbott and land commissioner Jerry Patterson, have joined former Sen. Fred Thompson's state campaign.

"We are stunned, betrayed, disappointed and as I told Gov. Perry's political adviser yesterday, we see this as a contradiction of everything the governor told us in the past and will find it very difficult to accept and believe what he tells us in future," said Laurence White, chairman of the conservative Texas Restoration Project.

White said Thursday he had been urging other pastors not to settle in the voting booth for the lesser of two evils and said he didn't buy Perry's electability argument.

"That's nonsense. We are not interested in the next election. We are interested in stopping abortion," White said.

New Spyglass Logo

It's all about control of Education Funding

Missing the Labor Angle

There's an effort to redistrict seven schools from Kansas City into the Independence school district in Missouri. As you might expect, there are parents, teachers, administrators and politicians on both sides of the issue. There are debates over funding and racial balance. This morning, there are numerous stories about a group organized by the Kansas City Federation of Teachers to halt the redistricting.

"The truth has to come out about this disingenuous scheme that, at its core, has nothing to do with education," said KCFT President Judy Morgan. "It won't be hard for voters to figure out who's for kids and who's just kidding."

If the redistricting plan has nothing to do with education, neither does the union's opposition to it. KCFT is an AFT affiliate. Independence teachers are represented by an NEA affiliate. No union in its right mind will simply hand over members to its rival. |

Fed jury clears cops in shooting of suicidal man


Fed jury clears cops in shooting of suicidal man
By Pamela Manson
The Salt Lake Tribune
Salt Lake Tribune

Posted: 10:07 AM- A federal jury has cleared two police officers in the 1998 fatal shooting of a suicidal man in his parents' Mount Pleasant driveway.
After more than five hours of deliberation, jurors rejected claims in a wrongful death lawsuit that David Walker's constitutional rights had been violated by the shooting.
"Both the officers and everyone involved in defending them are quite pleased," attorney Peter Stirba, who represented Pleasant Grove Officer John Clayton, said Friday. "We think it's a correct verdict."
The trial, before U.S. District Judge Ted Stewart in Salt Lake City, began Oct. 9. The verdict was returned about 8 p.m. Thursday.
Clayton and Orem Police Sgt. Harold Peterson chased Walker to his parents' home on Dec. 29, 1998, after his sister reported that Walker stole her car and was suicidal. The 25-year-old Walker got out of the car and at some point held a knife in front of him.
The officers, who said they believed the knife was a gun, fired. Peterson's attorney, Andrew Morse, said in opening statements that Walker was facing his client in a "shooter's stance" and holding an object that the officer thought was a .38 Special revolver.
Peterson shot Walker in the hip, and then Clayton shot Walker in the chest and back.
Walker's family sued the officers for unspecified damages. Stewart denied immunity to the officers, a decision that the 10th U.S. District Court of Appeals in Denver upheld last year.
Peterson is now retired; Clayton still works for the Pleasant Grove Police Department.
pmanson@sltrib.com

Thursday, October 18, 2007

Truth Test: School Voucher Ads Deciphered

voucherad3.jpg
Truth Test: School Voucher Ads Deciphered
October 17th, 2007 @ 9:55pm

Richard Piatt Reporting

Surely you've heard the claims, arguments and counter-arguments in the barrage of advertising on the issue of school vouchers. Tonight Eyewitness News has the first of a series of reports we're calling, "The Truth Test." We'll examine claims made in advertising on political races, and we'll do our best to give you the straight scoop.


We think the best way to tell you how to vote on any issue or candidate is to get informed and let you reach a conclusion yourself. Sometimes that's hard to do when you're bombarded with ads designed to change your mind, which means it's time for a "Truth Test."

Pro-voucher ads say a 'yes' vote for Referendum 1 would be good for public schools, shrinking class sizes and allowing funding per pupil to go up.

One illustration of how it would work is in an Oreo cookie ad: "Now this student decides to take $3,000 in a voucher and go to a private school. The class size goes down, and we can allocate the remaining money on the students who are still there."


That's true, but the question is how much a difference it would make. State analysts estimate school districts would save between $2.4 million and $11.5 million in the first year. The overall public school budget is $3.5 billion, making that savings three-tenths of one percent, at the most.

The program includes a 'hold harmless' clause; which allows schools to keep the difference between the cost of the voucher and the average funding per student. During this five-year trial period, the program is an 'experiment.'

Again in an ad, Rep. Rob Bishop says the program would be good for public schools: "Referendum One would allow us to increase the funding for public schools."

Technically that's true, but all funding increases are for the Legislature to decide, and the ad leaves out that vouchers would be a net cost to the state as a new state program.

Vouchers use money from the general fund budget, not the education budget. Estimates are the net cost to the state would be $5.5 million in the first year. Those opposed to vouchers want to capture that money and apply it toward public education now.

That is what Utahns for Public schools mean when it had the 2006 Teacher of the Year in an ad saying, "Private school vouchers take resources away from public schools."

In a financial sense, that's false, especially in the short run.

Again, vouchers are paid for out of the general fund, not the portion dedicated for public schools; and the $5.5 million dedicated to vouchers---even if it were applied to the education budget---would amount to two-tenths of one percent of the overall budget.

This is a philosophical difference of how to spend tax money. It's true, as with any new program, no one knows for sure how it would play out. In anti-voucher ads those questions are cast as troubling questions: "Setting few if any standards for private voucher schools. Like no accreditation, no accountability for our tax dollars and no requirement teachers have a credential."

That's false. In fact, school accreditation, accountability and teacher credentials are spelled out in both voucher bills. That includes requirements for annual student testing.

What is true in the ads is that testing isn't administered by the state. The tests are sent directly to parents and compared with nationwide results. The bill also addresses teacher and school standards. Those include college degrees or professional credentials for teachers. Schools must have more than 40 students and meet certain criteria.

Anti-voucher foes don't think the standards are extensive or public enough.

The bottom line is: Vouchers is a new program, but there is a lot of fear of the unknown being used to persuade you. That doesn't diminish the genuine concern for the public school system, which is plentiful.

Governor says he will vote 'for' private school vouchers referendum

Governor says he will vote 'for' private school vouchers referendum

Click photo to enlarge
Jon Huntsman Jr. (Trent Nelson/The Salt Lake Tribune)
Gov. Jon Huntsman Jr. joined Republican leaders at a press conference Wednesday to call for school vouchers as a tool to meet Utah's rapidly growing student population.
Despite being surrounded by voucher enthusiasts, the governor stopped short of asking Utahns to vote for the measure.
Huntsman said he signed the law and he would vote "for" Referendum 1 on Nov. 6, but added, "Whatever you think is right, whatever you can justify, is the right answer for you."
The governor said he loved the public schools his own children attend and they would remain there.
But he emphasized vouchers are "very much pro-public education," because the proposal would hold public education harmless and leave the bulk of funding behind as voucher students moved on to private schools. "That's a pretty good deal."
The Republicans displayed population charts showing a wave of 160,000 new students will hit the schools over the next 10 years. Without educational funding innovations, such as vouchers, lawmakers will have no choice but to hike taxes, they said.
"How do we take care of this without taxing our citizens into oblivion and out of their houses?" asked Sen. Sheldon Killpack.

Wednesday, October 17, 2007

Oh-eight (R): The GOP no-shows

Oh-eight (R): The GOP no-shows

Posted: Wednesday, October 17, 2007 9:07 AM by Domenico Montanaro
Categories: ,

We've gotten some chatter from some GOP party leaders who were in attendance at last night's RNC fundraiser wondering why all the presidentials blew it off. One activist said if Romney had not stayed, it would have been a PR and "psychological" disaster. NBC/NJ's Erin McPike reports: In the same week that the GOP’s four first-tier presidential candidates tried to best each other with their Republican credentials, only Mitt Romney addressed the Republican National Committee’s “Presidential Trust” dinner at the National Building Museum Tuesday night.

RNC spokesman Dan Ronayne said the event was new for the party and called it “a chance for our donors to see all the candidates.” Those 710 donors, each of whom contributed at least $1,000, helped raise $5 million for the party. But the only two candidates they saw were Mitt Romney and Ron Paul. Romney spokesman Kevin Madden said after the event, “Showing up is half the job. Gov. Romney was grateful for the opportunity to address all the Republican activists who are helping to build the party.”

Although Ronayne said that all of the party’s candidates were invited, the RNC’s program had included five, with Rudy Giuliani, Fred Thompson and John McCain slated to join Romney and Paul. Giuliani spokeswoman Maria Comella explained via e-mail after the event that Giuliani “was not originally scheduled to speak at the dinner” and added that “the RNC incorrectly advised it.” No warnings were issued concerning Thompson’s appearance, but he also failed to address the dinner crowd. After the event, a representative from Thompson’s campaign stated that as the schedule of the event changed, Thompson was happy to speak at the reception prior to the dinner instead.

The Washington Post looks at the scores of Bush '04 donors who are sitting on the sidelines. "For months, Republicans have worried about the lack of energy displayed by their loyalists and donors, especially when compared with the enthusiasm of Democrats. Polls consistently show Democrats to be far more excited about their candidates than Republicans are with theirs.”

Also of note, the New York Times looks at the differences between the GOP candidates on global warming. "It is a near-unanimous recognition among the leaders of the threat posed by global warming. Within that camp, however, sharp divisions are developing. Senator John McCain of Arizona is calling for capping gas emissions linked to warming and higher fuel economy standards. Others, including Rudolph W. Giuliani and Mitt Romney, are refraining from advocating such limits and are instead emphasizing a push toward clean coal and other alternative energy sources.”

GIUILIANI: Per NBC/NJ's Carrie Dann, if it weren't for the newsy change of date, the big news of the day would be that Rudy Giuliani will be campaigning in the state -- for one day only! -- for the first time since mid-August. Mitt Romney is also in the eastern part of the state for the first time since the Q3 rush.

Before he leaves for Iowa today, Giuliani receives his first endorsement from a sitting governor. Texas' ambitious Republican Gov. Rick Perry (can someone say short list?) will sign up with Giuliani just before the mayor speaks before a fairly friendly Club for Growth audience.


As for yesterday, Giuliani’s getting good reviews for his appearance at the Republican Jewish Coalition. Jennifer Rubin notes, "the highlight of [Rudy's] speech was his recounting of his eviction of Yasser Arafat from Lincoln Center. With a jab at Mitt Romney, he remarked that he did not have time to ‘call the lawyers’ and see if on one hand he could stay, on the other he couldn’t or perhaps he could be moved to higher seating. Giuliani said bluntly: ‘I just made a decision. I am a leader.’” More: “This was the ‘A’ game from Giuliani -- funny, pugnacious and crystal clear about who the good and bad guys in the world are."

The New York Sun calls Giuliani the "emotional winner" at the Jewish forum. But Maureen Dowd wasn’t as impressed. Her op-ed of Giuliani’s appearance yesterday is “Rudy Roughs Up Arabs.”

Dowd also notes Giuliani saying this about Hillary Clinton’s experience: “‘Honestly, in most respects, I don’t know Hillary’s experience. She’s never run a city. She’s never run a state. She’s never run a business. She has never met a payroll. She has never been responsible for the safety and security of millions of people, much less even hundreds of people.’”

The Wall Street Journal has a smart piece noting that it's Giuliani's foreign policy stands that's allowing him to connect "with social and religious conservatives, constituencies where the former New York City mayor's support has been seen as weakest."

MCCAIN: He kept at it yesterday, citing his credibility on military issues and Iraq. “’You've got people running for President who haven't even been to it,’” McCain said of Iraq” per the New York Daily News.

Perry backing Giuliani disappoints conservatives

10/17/2007

By SUZANNE GAMBOA / Associated Press

Conservatives and gun rights advocates in Texas said they are disappointed and mystified by Gov. Rick Perry's endorsement Wednesday of GOP presidential candidate Rudy Giuliani.

Perry endorsed Giuliani, the former New York City mayor, at an economic conference of the Club For Growth, a conservative advocacy group. Unlike Perry, Giuliani has favored abortion rights and gun control.

"When I go to buy a pickup truck, if it's got one option on it that I'm not either particularly fond of or not looking for, doesn't mean I discard that pickup truck. I'm looking at the results and I think that's what Americans will coalesce. They'll look for the results," Perry said.

The Texas governor, who accompanied Giuliani on a campaign trip to Iowa later in the day, said, "Mayor Giuliani is not the enemy. Rudy Giuliani is a culture warrior."

Perry is the first major-state governor to endorse Giuliani. His endorsement comes just in time for a three-day "values voter summit" that begins Thursday by the Family Research Council, a religious conservative group. Giuliani and other GOP candidates plan to attend.

Perry was also to attend two later town-hall style meetings in Iowa, appearances apparently aimed at reassuring conservatives who might be leery of Giuliani because of his support of abortion rights and past stands on gay rights and gun control.

Perry's endorsement of Giuliani is a letdown for many Texas social conservatives and gun groups, who have considered Perry a reliable ally on opposing abortion and embryonic stem cell research and defending gun ownership rights.

Elizabeth Graham, director of Texas Right to Life, said Perry called her Tuesday to tell her of his planned endorsement. She said she urged him to wait.

She said she was baffled by the endorsement.

"I reminded Gov. Perry we worked so hard in Texas to pass legislation .... and those efforts will be stifled on the federal level by a pro-choice president," Graham said.

Texas land commissioner Jerry Patterson, who is a chairman of rival Fred Thompson's Texas campaign, said he was confused by Perry's endorsement.

"One of the most, if not the most, conservative governors in Texas history endorses a pro-choice, rabidly anti-Second Amendment former New York mayor, who as mayor endorsed the Democrat Mario Cuomo over the Republican George Pataki for governor of New York?

"What happened to conservative principles as the first measure of who to support for any office?," Patterson said in an e-mail.

Cathie Adams, president of the Texas Eagle Forum, said Perry has put his supporters in a quandary. She said Giuliani shouldn't assume Perry's endorsement brings with it conservative backing.

"Just because Gov. Perry supports Giuliani doesn't mean we are going to follow him off a cliff and that's how I see it, off a cliff," Adams said.

Perry suggested he expects most of the decision-making on abortion and other issues to come from the Supreme Court.

He said he asked Giuliani "what type of individual can I expect on the Supreme Court? He said, 'You can look for people like (Justices Antonin) Scalia, (John) Roberts and (Samuel) Alito.' Well let me tell you, I can live with that," Perry said.

But Graham said Perry not only nominated anti-abortion judges, but his policy advisers and many people in charge of state agencies also have anti-abortion views. She said her group does not trust Giuliani to do the same.

"I think there are moderate Republicans or pro-choice Republicans in any circle and I think fear of (Democratic candidate) Hillary (Clinton) has spooked moderate Republicans into supporting Rudy and into thinking that a true blue conservative, a Republican, can't beat Hillary. I think that's a false assumption," Graham said.

Christian conservatives have long been influential in the Republican Party. But they've been unhappy with the 2008 GOP presidential candidates.

Perry, now in his second full term, is seen in some circles as a possible vice presidential nominee. But for that he would have to overcome voters' "Texas fatigue" from President Bush's administration.

Perry has insisted he's not interested in going to Washington, but he hasn't ruled out accepting an offer to be a running mate.

Cal Jillson, a political science professor at Southern Methodist University, said Perry likely assumes he can win back conservatives who disagree with his endorsement. "This is an attempt to create options for his career," Jillson said.

He said Perry is "burned out in Texas politics." Perry won re-election with 39 percent of the vote and had a sometimes rocky legislative session this year.

Giuliani has collected about $4.8 million from Texas for his campaign, more than any other presidential candidate. He is helped in part by his role as a name partner in the Houston-based law firm Bracewell & Giuliani, which has a healthy list of energy-giant clients.

Perry seemed to want some stealth for his endorsement.

Although the Club For Growth issued a news release announcing Giuliani would receive a major endorsement, Perry's office did not issue any media releases until just before the event.

Perry refused to stop to answer questions and relied on security and others to block a reporter trying to ask questions. When the reporter shouted the questions at Perry, the aides grabbed the reporter and threatened her with jail.

A Perry spokesman didn't immediatly respond to a question about the incident, but said his office would comment later.

Associated Press Writer Kelley Shannon contributed to this report from Austin, Texas.

Obama and Cheney discover hidden family ties

Barack Obama

Related News

Full coverage »

Obama and Cheney discover hidden family ties

WASHINGTON (AFP) — They are political polar opposites, but for Vice President Dick Cheney and Democratic presidential hopeful Barack Obama, hidden family ties run deep, as they are distant cousins.

The vice president's wife Lynne Cheney told MSNBC that she had uncovered the bizarre political twist while researching her new book, a memoir of growing up in the western state of Wyoming.

"Dick and Barack Obama are eighth cousins ... isn't that an amazing thing?" Cheney said in the interview.

"If you go back eight generations they have a common ancestor," Cheney said, adding they were both descended from a man that moved out west from Maryland.

"This is such an amazing American story that one ancestor ... could be responsible down the family line for lives that have taken such different and varied paths as Dick's and Barack Obama."

Obama's spokesman Bill Burton offered a tongue in cheek reply.

"Every family has its black sheep," he told AFP.

Obama often highlights his rich multicultural family heritage on the campaign trail -- his father was from Kenya and his mother was from Kansas.