Saturday, June 30, 2007

Clinton Slams GOP Rival's Cuba Remark

Clinton Slams GOP Rival's Cuba Remark

By BETH FOUHYThe Associated PressSaturday, June 30, 2007; 7:34 PM
LAKE BUENA VISTA, Fla. -- Taking a swipe at a potential GOP presidential rival, Democrat Hillary Rodham Clinton on Saturday criticized Fred Thompson for suggesting illegal Cuban immigrants pose a terrorist threat.

"I was appalled when one of the people running for or about to run for the Republican nomination talked about Cuban refugees as potential terrorists," Clinton told Hispanic elected officials. "Apparently he doesn't have a lot of experience in Florida or anywhere else, and doesn't know a lot of Cuban-Americans."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/06/30/AR2007063000221.html

Friday, June 29, 2007

Why Giuliani is Still the Frontrunner



Ross Kaminsky

Thu Jun 28, 4:30 PM ET

I am enthusiastic about both Fred Thompson and Rudy Giuliani. I believe one of them will be the Republican nominee.

There is a lot of excitement about Thompson and he is polling exceptionally well for someone who hasn't spent a dime on advertising or even officially entered the race.
I am a big fan of Thompson's recent commentary and speeches in which he emphasizes first principles such as federalism and limited government.
Thompson and Giuliani are likely to have fairly similar positions on economic and foreign policy issues. At this point, leaving aside the down-and-dirty political mudslinging we'll likely see, the real differences between the two are, from a true policy standpoint, social issues (particularly abortion), and, from a political perception standpoint, the question of "who is the real conservative?".
I believe this question is a double-edged sword for conservatives (and for the record, I don't actually consider myself a conservative; I'm far more libertarian.)
The conservative base of the GOP will be very tempted by Fred Thompson, as they should be. He is smart, charismatic (enough to be on TV and in movies at least), folksy, and his career as an actor will lead many to obvious comparisons with Ronald Reagan. And based on the little I know right now about Thompson, it is easy to conceive of him as a very good and effective President were he to win the election.
But that last qualifier is a very big deal.




Blogs Behaving Badly! The Inherent Anonymity of the Internet Blurs the Line Between Bloggers' Opinions and Campaign Tactics

Blogs Behaving Badly
The Inherent Anonymity of the Internet Blurs the Line Between Bloggers' Opinions and Campaign Tactics

By NADINE RUBIN
June 29, 2007


Celebrities have been the butt of blogger wrath for years -- just log onto www.perezhilton.com for a taste of puerile star wars. But now presidential candidates are getting a taste of Internet bashing.
Online since April, www.hillaryis44.com is a staunchly pro-Hillary Clinton blog, featuring daily opinions, updates on Clinton's position at the polls, T-shirts and buttons.
There's also a healthy dose of good ol' fashioned mudslinging. In particular there are a number of attacks on Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill. The blog encourages readers to send in "confidential tips," ostensibly to further scrutinize the Illinois senator. And in doing so, it begs the question: Is Clinton's campaign affiliated with the blog?
The campaign insists it is not. ABCNEWS.com's e-mail request for an interview with the person or persons behind hillaryis44.com -- sent to the blog's "confidential tips" address -- has not been met with a reply. On the blog's "Why Hillary" page is a statement that reads: "We are not affiliated with the Hillary for President Exploratory Committee, or any official Hillary Clinton organization in any way."

http://www.abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=3326566&page=1

Thursday, June 28, 2007

Those Who Do Not Learn From The Mistakes of History...?


Reposted

Friday, December 15, 2006

Those Who Do Not Learn From The Mistakes of History...?

The Left has been trying for some time now to morph the War on Terror into another Vietnam.
Here's what Victor David Hanson of National Review says:"Vietnam, My Lai, pullout, deadline, cutoff -- all the old remembrances are returning, as the graying antiwar generation of the 1960s will not go quietly into the night.
Abu Ghraib and Haditha are the new Tiger Cages and napalm; George Bush is the Johnson or Nixon of our age; and 'no blood for oil' is similar to the old mythical conspiracies of why we were in Vietnam."And the report gives the Left just what it wants -- surrender; albeit with high-minded words and a pretty package.
And what will happen if we follow the report's recommendations and leave before the job is done... before the Iraqis are able to handle this situation themselves... before we have reasonable assurances that Americans will be safe from future terrorist attacks?Hanson has a few words on that as well:
"Once we leave, the killing starts in earnest, not 20 or 30 per day, but wholesale slaughter of any Iraqis who taught school, or were clean shaven and wore Western dress, or fought to save Iraq. Millions of refugees flee to the West. Those who stay are killed or 'reeducated.' Islamism, like Communism, is empowered with the American defeat... Americans abroad will be ripe targets, since, like the Iranian hostage taking of 1979, there will be an unspoken assurance that the United States would not dare risk another Iraq/Vietnam."
Remember what happened when we let politicians run the war in Vietnam from thousands of miles away and pulled out before the South Vietnamese were ready to defend themselves?Mass murderer Ho Chi Minh executed and imprisoned numberless Vietnamese. Millions died. Hundreds of thousands fled the country, including the desperate boat people, many of whom drowned or died of exposure.
With American troops gone, the Khmer Rouge led by Pol Pot, a communist terrorist, took control of Cambodia; and during his reign of terror, 2 million Cambodians died of starvation, torture or execution -- approximately 30% of the Cambodian population.It can happen again! If we accept the recommendations of this report and cut and run, radical Islam will win and it WILL happen again!But it could be much worse this time!
Osama bin Laden, Iran's President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Syria's leader Bashar Assad, the suicide bombers who kill in the name of Allah -- will see our withdrawal as the final defeat of America ("the Great Satan").
America will be humiliated by a bunch of third-world thugs -- drunk on ideology -- who will win because they believed while Americans doubted.
And we will see brutality that will shock the world as America's enemies realize they can strike at us at home and abroad with impunity because our political leaders lack the will to do what must be done!
That's why patriotic Americans MUST take action NOW!

McCain Dismisses Talk of Quitting

McCain Dismisses Talk of Quitting
Friday June 29, 2007 2:01 AM

By LIZ SIDOTI
Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON (AP) - John McCain dismissed the notion Thursday that he would drop out of the race for the Republican presidential nomination because he's lagging in fundraising and trailing in polls.
``That's ridiculous,'' the Arizona senator told reporters in the Capitol. ``Why in the world would I want to do that?''
``It would be nuts,'' McCain said, adding that the first primary contests are a full six months away and arguing that voters won't start paying close attention until the fall. ``I don't know why I would even remotely consider such a thing in the month of June, or July.''

McCain won't give up on immigration; other GOP candidates say good riddance

By: Mark Memmott and Jill Lawrence

McCain won't give up on immigration; other GOP candidates say good riddance
The Senate has turned the page on immigration, but it's unclear whether Arizona Sen. John McCain can do the same in his campaign for the Republican presidential nomination.

McCain is a co-author of the defeated bill, which would have given millions of illegal immigrants a way to earn citizenship as well as strengthened border enforcement.

(Update at 4:15 p.m. ET: McCain issued a statement saying he is disappointed and making clear he is not giving up his fight. "The American people will not settle for the status quo –- de facto amnesty and broken borders," he said. "I am hopeful that we will have another chance to address this critical national security issue that affects people throughout our country. In the meantime, we must keep working to secure our borders while we continue fighting to reform our unenforceable immigration laws.")

In May polling, Giuliani tops the field of GOP hopefuls

In May polling, Giuliani tops the field of GOP hopefuls
By Susan Milligan, Globe Staff | June 28, 2007

WASHINGTON -- Republicans overwhelmingly want Ronald Reagan. But for the moment, they'll take Rudy Giuliani.

A comprehensive poll of 2,000 Republicans unveiled yesterday portrays a party in search of a leader, with the overwhelming majority hoping for someone like the former president. But when faced with the slate of 10 announced GOP candidates and two other potential contenders, those surveyed favored former New York mayor Giuliani across the board, with even so-called "moralists" preferring the candidate who has drawn fire from conservatives because of his divorces and his support of abortion rights.

"Giuliani is universally known to all Republicans," and scores high on leadership qualities among primary voters, said Tony Fabrizio, the GOP pollster who directed the comprehensive study. Among a 12-man field, Giuliani drew 30 percent support, followed by Arizona Senator John McCain with 17 percent, former senator Fred Thompson of Tennessee with 15 percent. Former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney and former House speaker Newt Gingrich, who has not announced a run, received 9 percent each.

Read the full story

www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2007/06/28/in_may_polling_giuliani_tops_the_field_of_gop_hopefuls



Captain Mark

Wednesday, June 27, 2007

A Setback for McCain-Feingold?


A Setback for McCain-Feingold?
Tuesday, Jun. 26, 2007 By REYNOLDS HOLDING

U.S. Sen. John McCain, a Republican from Arizona, speaks to reporters while Sen. Russell Feingold, a Democrat from Wisconsin listens.
Jacob Silberberg / AP

On the same day that the Supreme Court imposed a new limit on students' free speech in the Bong Hits 4 Jesus decision, the Justices ruled the opposite way in another first amendment case, protecting the rights of corporations and unions to shell out money for political ads shortly before an election.Related Ruling "Bong Hits" Out of Bounds

Was it a pro-drug banner or just a silly joke? Either way, the Supreme Court says it isn't protected by the First Amendment, setting a new (but fair) limit on student free speech

That may sound sweeping, but it's hard to know exactly what to make of the 5 to 4 decision, with the majority opinion also written, as in the Bong Hits case, by Chief Justice John Roberts. It seems to put a significant chink in the McCain-Feingold campaign finance law, and advocates for limiting campaign spending say it will draw a flood of corporate cash to TV spots pushing one candidate or another. But the decision is also very narrow, meaning it may well preserve the overall impact of McCain-Feingold and doesn't necessarily justify predictions of the end to spending restraint. As with the Bong Hits case, it also starts to show the ideological limits of the Roberts Court, where the President's two appointees, Roberts and Samuel Alito, are less open to sweeping legal change than their counterparts on the right, Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas.

Full Story: http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,1637305,00.html

Tuesday, June 26, 2007

Republican 2008 Presidential Nomination to come down to Rudy Giuliani vs. Fred Thompson

June 26, 2007 at 20:26:51
Republican 2008 Presidential Nomination to come down to Rudy Giuliani vs. Fred Thompson

by Steven Leser http://www.opednews.com

You can toss out the rest of the candidates, the race for the 2008 Republican Presidential nomination is going to come down to Giuliani vs. Thompson. Giuliani with his pro-Choice, pro-Gay rights and Anti-Gun center-right tack will make an interesting contrast with Pro-Life, Anti-Gay and darling of the NRA Thompson. The reason the other candidates don’t matter is that no one embodies either of the two factions of the Republican Party better than Giuliani and Thompson. The conservative right have no better champion in the announced (or should we say “pre-announced?” Can anyone articulate what Thompson’s status is now since he said several weeks ago that he “will announce around July 4th”. Doesn’t that mean you HAVE announced and you ARE a candidate?) candidates than Thompson. Duncan Hunter might be just as conservative, but personality-wise there is no ‘there’ there. The center-right who are not interested in the social agenda of the far-right and instead care only about a pro-business, anti-regulation and low tax candidate will tend to support Giuliani. That doesn’t leave anything of a base of a support for anyone else.

Read the full story http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_steven_l_070626_republican_2008_pres.htm

Monday, June 25, 2007

Romney finds funds to set the pace

June 26, 2007
Romney finds funds to set the pace
Tim Reid in Washington
Being a Mormon from Democrat-leaning Massachusetts would normally be a handicap for a Republican with presidential ambitions, yet Mitt Romney has broken through as a serious contender for his party’s nomination with another massive fundraising haul.
The former Massachusetts Governor, who outstripped his rivals unexpectedly in the first-quarter fundraising race, is set to unveil an equally impressive money haul this week.
This success is now being reflected in the latest polling. After spending $4 million since February on carefully targeted advertising, he leads the Republican field in the crucial early caucus and primary states of Iowa and New Hampshire. Rival campaigns have been forced to concede that he has become a significant force and a genuinely competitive top tier candidate.


http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article1985721.ece

Friday, June 22, 2007

Pirate Pictures

Here is a link to see Pirate Pictures from our Pirates III function

http://saltlakepirates.blogspot.com/

Captain Mark

Anderson Is No Quiet Lame Duck


Time flies when you're making waves. In only half a year, the sun will set on Rocky Anderson's eighth year as Salt Lake City's mayor. The two-term mayor announced last year that he is not running for re-election, and despite recent media reports to the contrary, he says that hasn't changed.
Salt Lake City Mayor Rocky Anderson hopes to make his fight against water bottles a national battle. Anderson, along with San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom and Minneapolis Mayor R.T. Rybak, will sponsor a resolution today at the U.S. Conference of Mayors in Los Angeles calling for a study on the impact of bottled water on cities' budgets and waste-disposal systems.
Posted: 5:24 PM- WASHINGTON - Prominent Mormon supporters of Sen. John McCain's presidential bid were outraged at a campaign worker's attempt to link the LDS Church to terrorists. Full Story
Captain Mark

Wednesday, June 20, 2007

Hillary Clinton — an artful dodger


Hillary Clinton — an artful dodger
By Ron Fournier

She flashed her sense of humour, displayed a deep knowledge of the issues and held her own in a forum that pitted her against other presidential rivals. But what stood out was her reluctance to address questions head-on SLICK HILLARY?
Former President Clinton earned the nickname “Slick Willy” for his mastery in the political arts of ducking and dodging. He had a knack for convincing people on both sides of an issue that he agreed with them.His wife may not be as smooth, but Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton is doing a passable impression of the ever-parsing former president.Would she pardon Scooter Libby?No comment.Would she nominate a union leader to be secretary of labour?Maybe.Would she repeal the North American Free Trade Agreement?Can’t say.The Democratic presidential candidate drew several rounds of applause for her appearance before the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees union on Tuesday. She flashed her sense of humour, displayed a deep knowledge of the issues and held her own in a forum that pitted her against other presidential rivals. But what stood out was her reluctance to address questions head-on.This habit of hers begs a question: Will the Clintonian tactic help her in the crowded Democratic field - or hurt her in the eyes of voters who have grown coarsened by the spin and obfuscation that marred both the Clinton and Bush administrations?“It’s obviously a skill that, in the long run, served Bill Clinton well, and there’s something to say for a politician who doesn’t alienate people by taking clear positions on issues,” said Charles Franklin, political science professor at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. “For Bill, it was certainly a useful skill for political success.”But he said the question for Hillary Clinton “is whether she can pull it off, because it’s certainly not an easy thing to do successfully.”She gave AFSCME her best shot.MSNBC host Chris Matthews asked Clinton at the labour forum whether former White House aide I. Lewis “Scooter” Libby should be pardoned.“Oh, I think there would be enough to be said about that without me adding to it,” she replied.“That is such a political answer!” complained Matthews. The largely Democratic audience buzzed, apparently in protest of Matthews’ response. One audience member told him to ask a “real question.” Clinton finished the person’s sentence: “ ... a question that’s really about the people in this audience and not what goes on inside of Washington,” she said.“So we’ll leave that as a non-answer,” Matthews said.Clinton 1, Moderator 0.Libby, the former chief of staff to Vice President Dick Cheney, was convicted in March of lying to investigators and obstructing Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald’s inquiry into the 2003 leak of a CIA operative’s identity. A federal judge said last week he will not delay a 2 1/2-year prison sentence for Libby in the case.Most conservatives want President Bush to pardon Libby. Most Democratic activists don’t. Indeed, Clinton’s rivals for the Democratic nomination didn’t hesitate to simply reply “no” when asked about a Libby pardon.It was the same dynamic on trade. Shortly after Rep. Dennis Kucinich vowed to repeal the North American Free Trade Agreement, Clinton was asked if she would move to scuttle it.She dodged. “Like anything,” Clinton said, “NAFTA had some positives, but unfortunately had a lot of downsides.”Clinton can be specific when she want to be. In her non-answer on NAFTA, she identified a soon-to-be-closed car plant by the small Michigan town where it’s located, and she talked in depth about the link between outsourced jobs and health care costs.Playing to the union crowd, Matthews asked Clinton whether she would nominate a union leader as secretary of the Labor Department. Yes or no? “It’s a great idea,” she said. “I think we should really consider that.” It wasn’t what you would call a firm commitment.Some voters might find it refreshing that Clinton passed up three chances to pander to liberal Democrats. Being against Libby, opposed to NAFTA and in favor of giving unions a voice at the Labor Department are no-brainers in Democratic primary fights.It may be that she’s looking beyond the nomination.“I kind of see those things as in keeping with her effort to paint herself as a more moderate Democrat than her image as first lady,” Franklin said.Until recently, Clinton distanced herself from the liberal, anti-war wing of the Democratic Party on Iraq _ a position that her advisers said was true to her convictions as well as smart general-election strategy. But, under pressure from activists who dominate primary and caucus voting, she has steadily edged to the left.She told the crowd on Tuesday that she had been calling for a troop withdrawal “for some time,” not mentioning that her rivals have held that position for a longer period. On the other hand, she said some troops will need to remain in Iraq to contain Al Qaeda, protect Kurds, keep an eye on Iran, protect the US Embassy and maybe train Iraqi forces. The answer offered a little something for everybody, for or against US involvement in Iraq. Pretty slick. ap

Sen. John McCain: 'I Will Respond If Attacked'

Wednesday, June 20, 2007 3:36 p.m. EDT
Sen. John McCain: 'I Will Respond If Attacked'
Reprint Information
Hillary Leads Superdelegate Primary
Bloomberg: 'I'm Not a Candidate' for 2008
GOP Clinches Ga. Congressional Seat
Bush Eyes Blair for Mideast Peace Role
Obama Wins Politico.com Straw Poll

The self-described "Happy Warrior" of the 2000 White House race has gone negative in 2008.
Republican John McCain struck a positive tone throughout much of his first presidential campaign, assailing rival George W. Bush only after the Texas governor engaged in nasty politics in South Carolina.

Eight years later, the Arizona senator is mixing it up with rival Mitt Romney with increasing intensity after largely ignoring the former Massachusetts's governor's criticisms - a full six months before voting begins, and as McCain, once considered the Republican to beat, finds himself struggling to regain momentum.

His support in early primary state surveys has been static or slipping; this week, polls in Iowa and South Carolina showed him in single digits. He is facing fierce challenges from Romney and Rudy Giuliani, sniping from lesser-knowns in the 10-man field and the wild card of actor-politician Fred Thompson, a likely entry.

Full Story: http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2007/6/20/153803.shtml?s=ic

Tuesday, June 19, 2007

McCain Decries Early Primary Trend, McCain: Early Presidential Primaries Only Serve to Hurt Voters, Candidates


By PHIL DAVIS Associated Press WriterFORT MYERS, Fla. Jun 19, 2007 (AP)

Republican presidential candidate John McCain said Tuesday that Florida's decision to move up its 2008 primary to Jan. 29 was part of a strange national trend that gives voters little time to pick the best candidate for their party.

Mark Towner

Fred Thompson Passes Rudy Giuliani in Latest GOP Poll



Fred Thompson Passes Rudy Giuliani in Latest GOP Poll
By Jackson Simpson

Jun 19, 2007

Fred Thompson now sits on top of the Republican presidential candidate field according to the latest poll from Rasmussen Reports. According to a morning story on the polling firm's website a national telephone survey finds the 'Law & Order' actor on the top of the heap even though he has still yet to officially declare his candidacy.
Fred Thompson Passes Rudy Giuliani in Latest Poll
The report notes that former Tennessee Senator Fred Thompson earning support from 28% of Likely Republican Primary Voters. Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani attracts support from 27%. While Thompson’s one-point edge is statistically insignificant, it is the first time all year that anybody but Giuliani has been on top in Rasmussen Reports polling. A week ago, Thompson and Giuliani were tied at 24%.
***
More notes from Rasmussen: Once gain this week, Arizona Senator John McCain and former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney are tied for a distant third. This week, both men attract 10% support. Last week, they were both at the 11% level of support. For McCain, this is a continuation of a downward trend. For Romney, it reflects a fairly steady position. Romney is doing well in selected state polls but has been unable to gain much traction and expand his support nationwide.
Former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee and Kansas Senator Sam Brownback are each the top choice for 2% of the likely voters. The combined total for five other candidates in the race is just under 3%. Those candidates are Congressman Ron Paul, Congressman Tom Tancredo, former Governor Tommy Thompson, Congressman Duncan Hunter, and former Governor Jim Gilmore. Eighteen percent (18%) say they’re not sure how they will vote.
***
On note - Rasmussen has dropped Newt Gingrich as a potential candidate as he has indicated that he will not run. Gingrich earned 7% support in last week’s polling.

Mitt's New Ad




Mark Towner

Bloomberg No Longer a Republican, NYC Mayor Leaves Republican Party, Registers As Independent



The Associated Press
By SARA KUGLER Associated Press WriterNEW YORK Jun 19, 2007 (AP)

New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg on Tuesday switched his party status from Republican to unaffiliated, a stunning move certain to be seen as a prelude to an independent presidential bid that would upend the 2008 race.
The billionaire former CEO, who was a lifelong Democrat before he switched to the GOP for his first mayoral run, said the change in voter registration does not mean he is running for president.




Mark Towner

Monday, June 18, 2007

GOP race fluid in state-by-state view


By LIZ SIDOTI, Associated Press Writer Mon Jun 18, 3:53 PM ET
WASHINGTON - Rudy Giuliani, John McCain (news, bio, voting record) and Mitt Romney dominate the 10-man field for the Republican presidential nomination, with Fred Thompson threatening to roil an unsettled race.

Rare circumstances serve as the backdrop.
The sitting Republican president and party standard-bearer, George W. Bush, has abysmal job-performance ratings. Vice President
Dick Cheney' name=c1> SEARCHNews News Photos Images Web' name=c3> Dick Cheney doesn't want the job and there's no natural heir, a significant departure for a party that historically has nominated the next in line.

The result is one of the most fluid GOP races in half a century.
Giuliani, a former New York mayor; McCain, an Arizona senator; and Romney, an ex-governor of Massachusetts, are the strongest contenders. They lead the field in organization, endorsements and money.

But Thompson, the former Tennessee senator and "Law & Order" actor, casts an enormous shadow and placed a close third behind Giuliani and McCain in a recent Associated Press-Ipsos poll. All but certain to enter the race, he's become a favorite of conservatives who are underwhelmed with the current field.

Underdog candidates — former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee, Kansas Sen. Sam Brownback (news, bio, voting record) and five other long-shots — are looking to catch fire in certain states.
The
Iraq' name=c1> SEARCHNews News Photos Images Web' name=c3> Iraq war, immigration, terrorism and abortion are the hottest issues.

To win, a candidate must collect a majority of delegates — 1,255 to be exact. That number, like the date of each state's contest and the delegate allotments, is in flux. Voting begins in January. Here's an early look at the race:
___
IOWA — Jan. 14 (32 delegates)
Romney has emerged as the one to beat, and his strategy calls for winning the caucuses to ride a momentum wave to New Hampshire. Unknown here before 2007, he's spent $1 million in TV ads and direct mail to introduce himself, visited 11 times and hired veteran operatives. McCain is vigorously campaigning here after skipping Iowa in 2000 and has built an organization that rivals Romney's. The 70-year-old senator is trying to overcome his unpopular support for immigration legislation, the perception that he is yesterday's candidate and doubts that he'll be a loyal Republican. Giuliani has sent mixed signals about how hard he plans to compete here. His support for abortion rights and gay rights alienates some conservatives. Both Giuliani and McCain bowed out of a high-profile straw poll in August. Thompson could find success in Iowa. Lesser-knowns pinning their hopes on the state haven't broken through. Brownback may have the best chance and is courting the religious right.
___
NEVADA — Jan. 19 (33 delegates)
The state presents a new dynamic for Republican hopefuls, given that it recently decided to hold its Republican caucuses earlier than in past years. Giuliani, McCain and Romney are trying to determine how to hard to compete in Nevada; the focus has been elsewhere. Nevertheless, all three have raised money here and rank well in surveys. So does Thompson. From neighboring Arizona, McCain may have the best chance to capture Nevada. He's a frequent visitor and he can readily address Western topics such as water rights, American Indian issues, property rights, energy development and immigration. Nevada ranks in the top five of states with the most Mormons and, as a member of that faith, Romney could benefit. But McCain isn't ceding any ground and has dispatched Utah Gov. Jon Huntsman Jr., a Mormon and an ally, to campaign in Nevada. Giuliani has scooped up some high-profile endorsements. One unknown is how the immigration issue plays in the Hispanic-heavy state.
___
NEW HAMPSHIRE — Jan. 22 (32 delegates)
The state should be McCain's to lose, given that the senator bested Bush here by 18 percentage points in 2000. He is universally known and has an existing network of backers. But he's fighting the notion that he's different from the rebel the state once embraced, and he's facing a serious challenge from Romney. The Bostonian has a vacation home here and is well-known as the GOP governor of liberal Massachusetts. His $1 million in TV ads have focused on a conservative message as he runs to the right of his rivals. Another Northeasterner, Giuliani, also has appeal here, with his moderate-to-liberal record. Independents are a wild card. In the last contested GOP primary eight years ago, they voted en masse in the GOP primary and helped McCain win. This time, the state is trending Democratic and independents could choose to participate in the star-studded Democratic contest. None of the long-shots is gaining steam.
___
FLORIDA — Jan. 29 (112 delegates)
The early advantage goes to Giuliani. The delegate-rich Sunshine State has a Republican electorate most amenable to his moderate-to-liberal views and plenty of retired New Yorkers. Giuliani, who has a double-digit lead in state surveys, has focused on solidifying support and building an organization here, perhaps more so than anywhere else. Giuliani also is a celebrity who attracts cash, and strong fundraising is crucial with Florida's expensive media markets. Romney is giving chase to Giuliani and has the support of several allies to popular former Gov.
Jeb Bush' name=c1> SEARCHNews News Photos Images Web' name=c3> Jeb Bush. McCain, too, is a regular in Florida, and campaigned for current Gov. Charlie Crist last fall. Three variables loom large: the impact of the strong-polling Thompson, how immigration plays in the Cuban and Haitian bastions and the fallout of the state's decision to move up the primary in violation of party rules. The GOP says states that cross it will lose half their delegates.
___
SOUTH CAROLINA — Feb. 2 (46 delegates)
The Southern state is ripe for Thompson to bigfoot the top-tier contenders who are locked in a three-way race but haven't won over influential conservatives. A state survey shows the all-but-declared candidate essentially tied with Giuliani. McCain's state campaign is a powerhouse in organization and endorsements, but his unpopular immigration stance and lingering resentment from a bitter 2000 race complicate his quest. He counts the state's popular Sen. Lindsey Graham (news, bio, voting record) as a close friend and adviser. Romney has a strong presence and has spent money on TV ads and direct mail. But his Mormon faith is an obstacle in a state heavily populated by Christian evangelicals. Giuliani is popular with moderates along the coast; conservatives elsewhere don't like his support for abortion rights and gun control. Huckabee is a possible dark horse, given his credentials as a Southern Baptist preacher and former governor. But some voters aren't convinced he can win in November. Enter Thompson, a Tennessean with a right-leaning Senate resume.
___
MEGA TUESDAY — Feb. 5 (at least 831 delegates)
It's all about momentum and money on Mega Tuesday; candidates will need heavy doses of both to compete in more than a dozen states holding contests. Retail politicking will give way to ultra-expensive TV advertising. More than 50 percent of the GOP delegates will have been chosen when voting ends on what amounts to a national primary day. If Giuliani survives earlier states, he could be a force given the roster of Northeastern states where he has ties and delegate-rich states where he could have appeal — California (173), New York (102), New Jersey (52) and Connecticut (30). The Giuliani camp has suggested the rapid-succession primary calendar may dilute the importance of leadoff states of Iowa and New Hampshire. Thus, he also has been spending time in Feb. 5 states and paying particular attention to California. There, and in some other states, candidates can win delegates congressional district by congressional district, and they may try to cherry pick the districts offering the most delegates. McCain and Romney contend the compressed calendar makes early states even more important. Even so, they, too, have ventured to California and are establishing operations in other Mega Tuesday states. Romney was born and raised in Michigan, and he's angling to triumph there. McCain won the state in 2000 and wants a repeat. Thompson's Tennessee and nearby Georgia also vote that day. Arkansas, where Huckabee was governor for 10 1/2 years, is on the roster as well.

New Gallup Poll, Giuliani still leads the GOP pack

New Gallup Poll
Posted: 18 Jun 2007 08:04 AM CDT
USA Today/Gallup released their new national poll today, putting Fred Thompson in second place on the GOP side: Republicans Giuliani 28 Thompson 19 McCain 18 Romney 7 Gingrich 7 Rudy Giuliani has an...

Brownback aide chided on anti-Mormon bid

Brownback aide chided on anti-Mormon bid

By HOPE YEN, Associated Press Writer Sun Jun 17, 4:47 PM ET

WASHINGTON - An aide to GOP presidential candidate Sam Brownback (news, bio, voting record) has been reprimanded for sending e-mail to Iowa Republican leaders in an apparent attempt to draw unfavorable scrutiny to rival Mitt Romney's Mormonism.
Emma Nemecek, the southeastern Iowa field director for Brownback's presidential campaign and a former state representative candidate, violated campaign policy when she forwarded the June 6 e-mail from an interest group raising the questions, the Brownback campaign said Sunday.

The e-mail requested help in fact-checking a series of statements about the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

Among the statements: "Theologically, the only thing Christianity and the LDS church has in common is the name of Jesus Christ, and the LDS Jesus is not the same Jesus of the Christian faith" and "The LDS church has never been accepted by the Christian Council of Churches."
"Sen. Brownback completely disavows himself of this and any personal attacks on religion," said Brian Hart, a spokesman for the Kansas senator. Hart said the campaign apologized to Romney, a former governor of Massachusetts, once they learned of the e-mail.

"It was not originated by Ms. Nemecek and the purpose was to fact-check. But it was in violation of campaign policy and it won't happen again," he said.
The controversy comes as Brownback and Romney are scrambling to attract socially conservative voters in advance of Iowa's Jan. 14, 2008, caucuses.

Both candidates say they are ardently anti-abortion, although Brownback — a former Methodist who has become an evangelical Roman Catholic — has criticized Romney for supporting abortion rights as recently as two and a half years ago.

A spokesman for Romney's Iowa campaign, Tim Albrecht, said the campaign accepted Brownback's apology but called the incident "unfortunate."

"It's unfortunate that these attacks of religious bigotry were taking place," Albrecht said. "Sen.
Brownback has apologized and we are glad he has worked to minimize these repugnant attacks in his campaign.

There is just no place for these types of attacks in America today."

First Amendment protects, doesn't bar, religion

First Amendment protects, doesn't bar, religion

By Joseph A. CannonDeseret Morning News
After my column on the resurgence of atheist books attacking religion, a reader wrote that I should "stop trying to shove (my) beliefs down everyone else's throats." He also noted that he has "a feeling that separation of church and state is something (I) loathe." Our reader is making a mistake, common at least since the 1960s, that because the First Amendment prohibits state-sponsored churches and protects religions from government interference that there can or should be no discussion of religion in the public square. The framers of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights were deeply concerned that state-supported churches and laws requiring certain types of belief in God would give religions the power of the state to enforce particular doctrines. Undergirding the framers' thinking is a strong commitment to a religiously pluralistic society in which all ideas, including religious ideas, compete in the marketplace. Thomas Jefferson, speaking about the conflict of religious beliefs, argued that "reason and free enquiry are the natural enemies of error." Jefferson believed that religion itself would benefit from open public discourse. Jefferson noted, for example, that "had the Roman government not permitted free enquiry, Christianity could never have been introduced." Alexander Hamilton believed that one of the principal attractions of the United States to prospective immigrants was that instead of "mere religious toleration" there existed under the new Constitution "a perfect equality of religious privileges." Far from wishing to exclude religion from the public square, the Founders had a deep understanding that not giving government sanction to a particular church would lead to religious diversity which would strengthen the religious impulse of the citizenry. George Washington understood this, and, speaking for many of his colleagues, said that "of all the dispositions and habits, which lead to political prosperity, religion and morality are indispensable supports." Paul Johnson in his exhaustive "A History of the American People," (Weidenfeld & Nicholson, 1997) concluded that "America had been founded primarily for religious purposes, and the Great Awakening had been the original dynamic of the continental movement for independence." So what does all this two-century old stuff have to do with our times? The debate about the role of religion in society continues and has escalated in recent years. Those against religion and belief in God have some more tools in their tool kits. The long trend of secularization and modernity beginning in the mid-19th century has had its effect. In great part, the existence of religion and its effects have been largely ignored in modern scholarly research and public policy. Many scholars treat religion as an artifact, believing that the postmodern world we find ourselves in has moved beyond religion. But it turns out that religion is much more stubborn than many of the scholarly crowd assumed. So stubborn that some scholars today are rethinking the role and consequence of religion in public life and culture. In 1994, Oxford University Press brought out "Religion, the Mission Dimension of Statecraft." This study was "prompted in part by a concern that the rigorous separation of church and state in the United States has desensitized many citizens to the fact that much of the rest of the world does not operate on similar basis." In order to achieve more peaceful reconciliation to bitter conflicts, greater stress must be placed on "approaches that key to deep-rooted human relationships (religion) rather than to state-centered philosophies." The contributors to this volume believe that religion in general and religious individuals in particular can play a "powerful role in peacemaking" in world conflicts. More recently, and more fundamentally, a group of American scholars are rediscovering that religion is an indispensable tool in understanding why some countries are successful and why others are so "agonizingly slow" to progress toward "democratic governance, social justice and prosperity." Two recent books, "Culture Matters," (Basic Books, 2000, edited by Lawrence E. Harrison and Samuel P. Huntington) and "The Central Liberal Truth" (Oxford, 2006, Lawrence E. Harrison) talk about the relationship between cultural values and human progress. Harrison is an immensely well-respected scholar at the Fletcher School at Tufts University and a former director of a number of United States Agency for International Development missions in Latin America. Based on two decades of intimate observation of Latin America, Harrison concluded that the fundamental problems leading to the underdevelopment in Latin America had more to do with culture than other factors and that "culture is powerfully influenced by religion." In a recent interview on C-SPAN, Harrison stated that it is hard to overstate the role of religion in the successful development or underdevelopment of countries. Some commentators disagree with Harrison on his evaluation of particular religions and particular regions and some disagree as to the weight applied to religion in his analysis. However, everyone agrees that he has reshaped our understanding of the relationship between religion and international development. These two examples of recent scholarship underline the importance of religion even in our post-modern culture and the need for civil public discussion of religion. Such a discussion is entirely consistent with intent of the Founders of our country, does not violate the principle of separation of church and state, and is not intended to "shove" anyone's particular religious beliefs down another's throat.

Joseph A. Cannon is the editor of the Deseret Morning News.

Giuliani stays above fray - & rides high


Giuliani stays above fray - & rides high
BY DAVID SALTONSTALLDAILY NEWS SENIOR CORRESPONDENT
Sunday, June 17th 2007, 4:00 AM

As the front-runner in the Republican primary for President, Rudy Giuliani is supposed to be the biggest target in the race - he has certainly got his vulnerabilities.
But in a shift that underscores Giuliani's steady perch atop the GOP polls, Republican rivals John McCain and Mitt Romney are increasingly aiming their barbs at each other, not Giuliani, in what many see as a new race-within-the-race - the battle for second place.
"It looks like this primary will be between Rudy and someone," said Republican consultant Roger Stone, who is not working for any of the candidates. "And this race has become a fight over who that second someone will be."

The dynamic could not have been clearer last week. As Giuliani merrily announced a 12-point plan for America - while aiming all his jabs at Democrats - Romney and McCain were engaged in an increasingly bitter intra-party brawl.

It started when McCain reopened charges that Romney had flip-flopped on abortion, in part with a new, in-your-face letterhead that announced, "Mitt vs. Fact. Say. Do. Anything."
The packaging was a satirical punch at Romney's campaign logo of "Strong, New, Leadership," and Romney's camp hit back hard, saying the attacks were a "desperate" ploy by a "faltering" campaign.

It was all music to the ears of Team Giuliani, which happily stayed above the fray, even though the former mayor's pro-choice views make him by far the most vulnerable on the topic among conservative voters.

"Right now there are two candidates fighting about abortion, and Rudy's not one of them," said a pleased Giuliani aide. "That's a good day for us."
Aides to Romney and McCain said they weren't aiming their barbs at Giuliani because they believe that sooner or later, his pro-choice, pro-gay rights views will catch up with him and send his poll numbers plummeting.

Indeed, Giuliani's numbers already seem to be inching down in conservative primary states such as Iowa, New Hampshire and South Carolina, where he now runs second or third. But he remains firmly atop most polls.
Experts say Giuliani's ability to avoid the crossfire underscores how McCain and Romney - and now former Tennessee Sen. Fred Thompson, it seems - are increasingly fighting for the same conservative wing of the GOP.

Meanwhile, Giuliani is left to sweep up the 40% of Republican voters who consider themselves pro-choice, as well as others within the GOP drawn to his record as a fiscal conservative.
"He sustains no damage by floating above the fray," said Stone. "He just continues to build his image and say what he wants to say, while the others go at each other."
dsaltonstall@nydailynews.com

The Immigration Debate: Globalists vs. NationalistsMerrill Cook

The Immigration Debate: Globalists vs. NationalistsMerrill Cook

Much of the local reporting regarding the immigration debate has focused on immigration rights groups, like La Raza versus illegal immigration opposition groups, like the Minuteman Project. While this has been a colorful, interesting - and, indeed - important conflict, the more significant battle underlying the immigration debate is between corporate America and America's middle class, or rather, between the globalists and the nationalists.

The current Senate Bush-Kennedy-McCain amnesty bill for 12 to 20 million illegal aliens is little more than an attempt to reward mass criminality. The provision in the bill for enhanced border security is "a spoonful of enforcement to make the amnesty go down." No one is surprised by Sen. Kennedy's commitment to amnesty.

The important question is: Why would the president of the United States and a number of leading Republicans in the Congress be so willing to stomp all over the conservatives and tear the Republican Party apart in their rush to be the architects of this so-called "Grand Immigration Compromise?" The answer lies in the ongoing fight between corporate America and America's middle class workers. This battle can also be characterized as a fight between those whose priority is globalization (the globalists) versus those whose priority is American sovereignty (the nationalists). The political action committees (PACs) of America's largest companies, especially the multi-nationals, provide the bulk of the money to both political parties and particularly to the campaigns of members of Congress. The No. 1 priority of big business today is to have an endless supply of cheap immigrant labor and to avoid penalties for hiring illegal aliens in violation of current U.S. law.

The next most important (and related) priority of big business is to enable its labor force to move just as freely across national boundaries as trade and capital do. In concert with America's political and economic elite, big business wants a world without borders. Corporate America's fight to legalize America's 12 to 20 million illegal aliens is directly related to its desire to unify Canada, the U.S., and Mexico into a North American Union similar to the European Union. The ultimate goal is global governance and the withering away of national sovereignty. With the vastly lower cost of labor inherent in both of these big business priorities, corporate profits will soar, at least in the short term.

America's workers strongly opposed NAFTA and China's Permanent Most Favored Nation status. Both were promoted by corporate America particularly the multi-nationals. A trade surplus with Mexico at the time NAFTA was enacted has turned into a $1 billion per week trade deficit. The Permanent Most Favored Trade status for China enacted in 2000 has resulted in a $1 billion per day trade deficit! Even the most conservative estimates indicate a loss of at least 6 million American manufacturing jobs from these two pieces of legislation. These corporations in the words of Pat Buchanan, "Want to be rid of their American workers, but keep their American consumers."

America's current political leadership, in crafting the "Immigration Grand Compromise" currently in the Senate in return for campaign contributions from corporate America PAC, has exposed itself as a facilitator in the effort to sell America's middle class down the river. It's up to the people to rise up and stop it.

Merrill Cook is a former member of Congress. He resides in Salt Lake City.

Rolly: Romney's Mormonism a problem for ambitious Utah Republicans


Rolly: Romney's Mormonism a problem for ambitious Utah Republicans
Paul Rolly
Article Last Updated: 06/16/2007 01:15:26 PM MDT

Gov. Jon Huntsman Jr., Attorney General Mark Shurtleff and Senate Majority Leader Curt Bramble say they are bucking their Mitt Romney-loving compatriots in the Utah Republican Party by endorsing John McCain for president because they are so impressed with the man. Skeptics would beg to differ. After all, it was just two years ago that Huntsman told the Deseret Morning News that he was writing briefing papers for Romney and helping the then-potential candidate behind the scenes. He also said then that he wasn't interested in joining a presidential administration because he loved his job as governor. But former Gov. Mike Leavitt spouted the same thing, right up until the time he accepted President Bush's nomination to be administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency. In that same 2005 interview, Huntsman said that he had talked to national security and foreign policy experts in Washington, D.C. about helping Romney if the former Massachusetts governor were to run for president. But, like the ad says, life comes at you fast. Just a year later, Huntsman was foursquare behind Arizona Sen. John McCain's presidential bid. Did the governor think him the better man? Perhaps. But Republican insiders close to the Romney campaign say politics can provide cruel ironies sometimes. And here's a beauty: While Romney's presidential aspirations excite fellow members of the LDS Church, giving them a real hope that the country might see its first Mormon president, Mormons with their own high political ambitions will be disadvantaged if Romney wins. There will be no Mormons in a Romney Cabinet, or in any other high-profile job in the administration, Romney backers say, because of the candidate's sensitivity about the negative view so many people seem to have about The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. The Romney candidacy itself has been beneficial for the church's image, especially with his recent rise in the polls and favorable showing in Republican candidate debates. If he proves himself an acceptable candidate, maybe Mormons really aren't so weird, the logic goes. "The only thing that would be better is if Romney were bald so people could see he doesn't have horns," joked one Romney worker bee. But Romney supporters say he is acutely aware of the misgivings about Mormonism, especially among Christian fundamentalists, and will not aggravate anyone's paranoia by appointing Mormons to high positions. So if Huntsman, say, would like to be in a Cabinet, or ambassador to China or India, Romney is not the star to which he would hitch his hopes. Shurtleff, too, has ambitions. And, as fate would have it, is a fellow Mormon. The attorney general has indicated he would like to run for the U.S. Senate when one of those two seats opens up. That means that either Bob Bennett, whose third term ends in 2010, or Orrin Hatch, whose sixth term ends in 2012, would have to retire. Both senators would be in their late 70s when their respective terms expire, making each of them old enough to be Strom Thurmond's son during his last term in the Senate. So Shurtleff, too, might favor an administration with no LDS ties. Then there is Bramble. His recently announced endorsement of McCain set off negative blog traffic in his home base of Utah County, where McCain is seen as too liberal. But Bramble is a dad. A good one, by all accounts. And today is Father's Day. And Bramble's son Jeff already is showing signs of political interest, serving as an intern in the Utah Senate and running a political action committee for Utah County Republicans. And, it is said, will soon be employed by none other than Sen. John McCain.

Rick Koerber FreeCapitalist.com

Thoughts This Father’s Day
by Abel KeoghJune 15, 2007

One of my heroes is Orson Scott Card. An award-wining writer and gifted storyteller, Card has a talent for writing wonderful novels with believable characters, solid plots, and, ultimately, positive messages.
But it’s more than Card’s ability to write well-crafted, entertaining novels that make him one of my heroes. What I really admire about Card is his dedication to his family and how seriously he takes his role as a father.
I was reminded of this after reading a column he wrote for The Rhinoceros Times. Card, who has been teaching at Southern Virginia University for the last two years, gave a final exam to the students in his Contemporary American Novel course. He asked his students to compare the American culture depicted in novels they had read to their own experiences with American culture.
As Card read the essays, one of the themes he found throughout them was the comments about decisions the students’ parents made. For example, some fathers had taken lower paying jobs so they could raise their kids in a small community rather than a large city. Some mothers made the decision to stay at home. Other parents had made decisions to move their families to more family friendly neighborhoods instead of more affluent ones. Many rearranged their lives or made other sacrifices so that at least one parent could be at home and that the children had easy access to both parents.
Reading about the decisions these parents made forced Card to re-examine the decisions he was making as a father. Card wrote:
What was I doing, driving three hours each way to teach at a university? I would leave on Tuesday morning and not be home till late Thursday night. I still have a newly teenaged daughter at home.
What message was I giving her, compared to the message these other parents had given their children?
Wasn't the message: "Being a professor and getting to do cool stuff at a university is so important to me that I will miss 3/7 of your remaining years at home"?
In other words, I was saying: "Other people's children are more important to me than you are."
I had thought that I was doing something quite noble and wonderful -- and, in the long view, it's hard to think of a nobler and more wonderful profession than teaching.
But most parents who absent themselves from their children's lives believe they're doing something noble and wonderful.
Until I read about what my students' parents had done for them, I couldn't see how I was not practicing what I preached.
Even as I told people in essays and speeches that the most important gift parents can give their children is their physical presence in a loving home, I was going off to another city three days a week -- and I couldn't even pretend I had to do it for money, because that isn't how I made my living.
Then Card announced his decision to stop teaching – for now anyway. Once his youngest child is in college, he’ll consider going back to the roll of mentor. In the meantime he’s rededicating himself to a career as a father with everything else relegated to the status of a job or hobby.
Reading Card’s column a week before Father’s Day, struck a chord with me. As a father of three young kids, it made me consider how I’m doing as a father.
Am I spending as much time as possible with my kids or am I filling my time after work with “more important” things like checking e-mail or other activities that can really wait until the kids go to bed? If I come home from work tired and frustrated, am I taking my frustration out on the kids? In short, what kind of example am I being to them? Am I showing them that they’re important to me and that I value my time with them?
I’m far from being a perfect father. I’m still learning how to control my temper when my boys spill flour or frozen vegetables when I’m cooking dinner. And I could probably do a better job of paying attention to my six-month-old daughter when she coos at me late at night when she’s sitting next to me as I work on my next book.
But I’m doing something right – at least I think I am. I think I’m doing a reasonably good job of not only spending free time after work with them but taking an interest and being involved in their activities.
After my three-year-old goes to bed, I sit next to him and talk with him about whatever’s on his mind. Usually these talks evolve into some sort of tickle game but I know those five to ten minutes together are his favorite part of the day and the part he always makes sure I’m going to do as I help him get ready for bed.
Because the practice proved successful with my three year old, I started spending a few minutes with my 19-month-old son after he goes to bed. Even though he’s not as excited about it as his older brother about his alone time with dad, his eyes do light up when I enter his room, sit next to him in bed, and talk.
Hopefully I’m not just paying lip service to the importance of fathers but showing my children that they are important enough to me that can put some things aside and focus on them.
Father’s Day is a great day to recognize the important roll of fathers and the influence they’ve had on our lives. But it’s also a good time for fathers to pause for a moment and make sure they’re not only giving their children a loving home to live in, but their time and presence too.
Thank you, Mr. Card, for reminding all fathers everywhere what our real focus should be and for not just mouthing the words of a hero but acting like one too.


Abel Keogh is the editor of FreeCapitalist.com. You can email him here. His book, Room for Two, will be published by Cedar Fort this fall.

Friday, June 15, 2007

McCain Buys Anti-Romney Web Site Name

Friday, June 15, 2007 11:11 a.m. EDT
McCain Buys Anti-Romney Web Site Name

John McCain’s presidential campaign has bought the Web site name www.mittvsfact.com and will launch the site to illustrate White House hopeful Mitt Romney’s alleged flip-flops.
As NewsMax reported, the McCain campaign on Wednesday sent out an e-mail release, with a "Mitt vs. Fact” letterhead, that attacked Romney on the abortion issue.

It linked to a video showing then-Massachusetts Gov. Romney vowing to uphold the state’s abortion-rights laws. Romney has now called for the repeal of Roe v. Wade, the 1973 Supreme Court decision legalizing abortion nationally.

A McCain aide confirmed to The Politico on Friday that his campaign had purchased the mittvsfact Web site last month and "indicated that they would use it as a sort of one-stop shop ‘to brand’ Romney,” according to The Politico.

But the Romney campaign said McCain’s attacks pointed to trouble in his own campaign.
"Desperate candidates do very desperate things,” Romney spokesman Kevin Madden declared.
"Sen. McCain has, sadly enough, been faltering so badly lately that his campaign is left with the last resort of launching attacks against Gov. Romney.”

© NewsMax 2007. All rights reserved.

What Happened to the McCain Campaign?

What Happened to the McCain Campaign?

Arizona Senator John McCain (news, bio, voting record) (R) began the Election 2008 season as the presumed frontrunner for the GOP nomination. Now, he is struggling to stay ahead of Mitt Romney for third place in the hearts and minds of Republican Primary voters. The trends aren't encouraging for the war hero who challenged then-Governor Bush for the nomination eight years ago.

Polling completed last night (June 14) shows that just 48% of American voters have a favorable opinion of McCain. That's down from a peak of 59% in December and 55% just two months ago. Forty-five percent (45%) have an unfavorable opinion.

The most recent polling on the Republican Presidential nomination contest shows McCain at 11% (tied with Romney). That's just half the 22% level support he enjoyed in January and less than half the current support for both former Mayor Rudy Giuliani and former Senator Fred Thompson.

While losing ground, perceptions of McCain's ideology has shifted significantly. More voters are likely to see McCain as politically conservative today than they did when the campaign began. In December, just 26% viewed McCain as a conservative, a figure that grew to 45% in May.

Normally, being seen as more conservative would help a candidate in the Republican primary campaign, but it didn't work for the man from Arizona.
What happened?

In retrospect, it appears that McCain was never really the dominant frontrunner that many had assumed. The early polls showing Giuliani ahead were dismissed as meaningless because "everybody knew" that Giuliani couldn't win the Republican nomination. America's Mayor has shown a lot more staying power than expected. Looking back, it now appears that McCain and Giuliani were holding their own preliminary competition for the right to face off against a more conservative challenger for the nomination. Giuliani won that round and the most likely scenario now is for GOP voters to end up with a choice between Giuliani and either Romney or Thompson.

But, McCain's problems are deeper than just being an over-rated frontrunner when the season began. Substantively, the playing field shifted in ways that made it far more difficult for McCain.
One of the challenges faced by every Republican hopeful in 2008 is to show that they would be different from

President Bush' name=c1> SEARCHNews News Photos Images Web' name=c3> President Bush while also remaining a loyal Republican. McCain, at one level, had seemed a natural for that role. His jostling with the President was a constant feature of the early Bush years. In fact, the bigger challenge for McCain among Primary voters was proving he was a team player.
Now, however, McCain is in lockstep with the President on the two biggest issues of the day… the War in
Iraq' name=c1> SEARCHNews News Photos Images Web' name=c3> Iraq and immigration.

Those are precisely the two issues where every candidate would want to have as much separation from the President as possible. Most Americans say the President is doing a poor job handling the situation in Iraq and a candidate seen as extending the Bush approach in Iraq will not win Election 2008.

The Senate immigration bill backed by the President is opposed by a broad cross-section of the American public. McCain's vocal and visible support for that bill has cost him dearly over the past month… both among Republican Primary voters and the general public.

In the end, this places the Arizona Senator in a box that Harry Houdini would have trouble escaping. His positions on immigration and Iraq put him at odds with the American public on two hot button issues. He is identified with an unpopular President on those issues at a time when voters are looking for a new direction. At the same time, many conservatives continue to have doubts about McCain and his loyalty to their team.

Rasmussen Reports is an electronic publishing firm specializing in the collection, publication, and distribution of public opinion polling information.

'Super-Duper Tuesday' May Be Too Big to Matter

Sheer Number of States,Timing Will ReinforceImpact of Opening Trio
By JACKIE CALMESJune 15, 2007; Page A6

An unprecedented number of states have scheduled early presidential primaries to grab some influence from the traditional first kingmakers, Iowa, New Hampshire and South Carolina. But as the law of unintended consequences would have it, the front-loaded calendar could instead make that opening trio of states -- and roughly a half-million voters in each party -- more decisive than ever.

On Feb. 5 -- widely called "Super-Duper Tuesday" -- nearly two dozen states, from New York to California, may hold what approaches a national primary. In 2004, just nine states had voted by then. The crush in 2008 will mean that no contender has the time and money to stump in all the Feb. 5 states with anything near the intensity candidates do in states with January contests. That is why Florida has defied both parties' rules aimed at minimizing front-loading, and moved up its primaries to Jan. 29 from March; Michigan's Democrats might follow.


Read the full story: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118186324620336039.html?mod=tff_main_tff_top

Mark Towner

Giuliani: Nation lacks strong leadership

Giuliani: Nation lacks strong leadership
By RANDALL CHASE
Associated Press Writer

Matt Rourke
Republican presidential hopeful Rudy Giuliani greets supporters during a rally in Wilmington, Del., Thursday, June 14, 2007.

WILMINGTON, Del. - Republican presidential candidate Rudy Giuliani, in an indirect swipe at President Bush, said Thursday the overwhelming attitude that the U.S. is headed in the wrong direction reflects a lack of leadership.
The nation's bleak mood was evident in the most recent Associated Press-Ipsos poll in which only 21 percent said they believe things in the U.S. are heading in the right direction, the worst mark since the AP-Ipsos poll began in December 2003.
Speaking at a Flag Day rally in Wilmington, Del., Giuliani told more than 200 supporters: "What we're lacking is strong, aggressive, bold leadership like we had with Ronald Reagan."
The same AP-Ipsos poll found public approval with the job Bush is doing at 32 percent, matching an all-time low.
The former New York mayor said he's running for president to keep the United States on offensive against terrorist and to challenge big government.
Before the rally, Guiliani attended a $1,000-a-plate fundraising breakfast that drew about 120 people.
He was joined at the rally by former FBI director Louis Freeh. Freeh, who lives in Wilmington, Del., serves as senior homeland security adviser for Guiliani campaign and heads the candidate's Delaware campaign.
Giuliani was making his second campaign appearance in Delaware this year. While the state has only three electoral votes, Guiliani said it could play a crucial role in the presidential race.
"When you look at 2000 and 2004, one state makes a difference," he told reporters after the rally. "You never know which one it's going to be."

Romney, McCain trade shots over posting of video

Romney, McCain trade shots over posting of video

By Rick PearsonTribune political reporterPublished June 14, 2007, 8:03 PM CDT

Republican presidential contender Mitt Romney on Thursday accused rival John McCain's campaign of dishonesty in posting to the Internet portions of a video that McCain's camp contends is proof of Romney's waffling on the issue of abortion rights.But McCain's campaign fired back, saying it will post on its campaign Web site the entire video, which also shows Romney's support for lifting a federal ban on embryonic stem-cell research which was vetoed by President Bush.

Romney, a former Massachusetts governor who is seeking conservative backing in his bid for the GOP nomination, has been forced along the campaign trail to repeatedly detail his conversion from a supporter of abortion rights to an opponent of the procedure—as he did during a campaign and fundraising visit to Chicago on Thursday.During a debate in his 2002 run for governor, Romney pledged to Massachusetts voters that he had "been very clear" and would "preserve and protect a woman's right to choose."But Romney has said he began opposing abortion rights in November 2004 after he said a discussion with a researcher involving embryonic stem cell research made him feel that human life was not being valued.Earlier this week, in an unusually sharp attack for this stage of the campaign, McCain's campaign released a video of a Romney news conference from May 2005 in which the then-governor said he was "committed" to maintaining existing abortion laws."Mitt Romney's biggest challenge in this election will be convincing Republicans he has principled positions on important issues, especially now that it's known that he remained committed to pro-choice policies after his 'epiphany' on abortion in 2004," Matt David, McCain's deputy communications director, said in a statement.Romney said Thursday the portion of the video posted to the Internet only showed a portion of his remarks that day. In its entirety, he said, the video was shot at a news conference "at which I described why I was vetoing cloning legislation because it didn't respect the sanctity of life."And Romney contended the Arizona senator's campaign was "not being honest enough to put the full press conference" on the Internet. And, with another GOP contender, Sen. Sam Brownback of Kansas, weighing in on the attacks on Romney Thursday, the former governor contended his opponents had "stooped to making an attack."But a McCain spokesman said the entire video shows Romney expressing support for lifting the Bush administration's ban on federal embryonic stem-cell research. ABC News, which reported Thursday on Romney's May 2005 speech, said the then-governor supported the use of surplus embryos from in vitro fertilization. The Massachusetts legislation Romney vetoed that day would have gone further to include human cloning and allowed for the creation of embryos purely for research."The facts are clear, Mitt Romney advocated pro-choice policies even after his alleged 'epiphany' in 2004," said McCain spokesman Danny Diaz. "Voters should go to www.johnmccain.com to watch the entire press conference and judge for themselves as to whether Mitt Romney not only changed his position on abortion, but also federal funding of stem cell research."ABC News also reported that within two months of Romney's November 2004 conversion as an abortion rights opponent, he appointed to the Massachusetts bench a Democrat who was a noted supporter of abortion rights.On another topic, Romney lashed out at U.S. Atty. Patrick Fitzgerald's handling of the special CIA leak investigation in Washington that resulted in the conviction of former vice presidential chief of staff Lewis "Scooter" Libby. Romney contended Fitzgerald may have abused his prosecutorial discretion as special prosecutor in the Valerie Plame leak case.Libby was ordered Thursday to report to prison soon while his conviction is being appealed.Romney said Fitzgerald, who has earned a reputation of a corruption fighter in his role as U.S. attorney for the Northern District of Illinois, "may well have abused prosecutorial discretion by pursuing the investigation" after learning that former Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage revealed Plame's identity as a CIA operative to the media in 2003."He knew that, therefore, a crime was not committed and yet he proceeded with an investigation knowing there was no crime to pursue," Romney said of Fitzgerald.Romney said he was not calling for any sanctions against Fitzgerald, but said "that abuse of prosecutorial discretion justifies a very careful look at a possible [presidential pardon]." Romney also said he had not awarded any pardons during his tenure as governor.Looking at an important issue during his tenure as governor, Romney criticized lawmakers in Massachusetts for failing to allow voters Thursday to decide the issue of gay marriage there after a state Supreme Court ruling made it legal. He said it underscored the need for a constitutional amendment to define marriage."We need to have a federal marriage amendment to assure marriage is a relationship between a man and a woman because states like Massachusetts will take the course they did, which is letting the (state) Supreme Court make this decision, taking the decision away from the people," he said.Romney contended that throughout civilization, marriage was defined between a man and a woman on the basis of child raising."I believe moms and dads associated with the development and nurturing of children is one of the major purposes of marriage and therefore, to protect that nurturing setting, we need to have moms and dads and not two moms and two dads," he said.Rap30@aol.com

Copyright © 2007, Chicago Tribune

SURELY A MORMON CANNOT BE PRESIDENT



SURELY A MORMON CANNOT BE PRESIDENT

By David Shurtleff, Mormon chaplain in the U.S. Army

Heliumites, bloggers, Political Scientists...lend me your eyes. I come to criticize Mitt Romney. The evil that men do is highlighted by the media. The good is often buried under labels...so let it be with Romney.

The Media has touted that Romney is a Mormon, if it is so, it is a grievous thing and may cost him the election.

When the scandal laden Olympics was embarrassing our nation, Romney stepped in and turned it into a showcase-Yet Romney is a MORMON, and surely a MORMON cannot be President.

Romney won the governorship of Massachusetts as a REPUBLICAN, yes, in a state that gives us Sen. Kennedy. He showed the ability to work with all people, of all political backgrounds-Yet Romney is a MORMON and surely a MORMON cannot be President.
Romney saved a state government facing fiscal disaster, bringing economic expansion and staving off unemployment, something this nation could use- Yet Romney is a MORMON, and surely a MORMON cannot be President.

Unlike many politicians, Romney has remained faithful to his wedding vows, keeping his commitments to his wife and blessing his children-Yet Romney is a MORMON, and surely a MORMON cannot be President.
The twelfth article of Romney's faith, one which he no doubt memorized as a child, affirms that it is his duty to honor, obey, and sustain the law- Yet Romney is a MORMON, and surely a MORMON cannot be President.
Romney's faith group is recognized and respected by governments throughout the world, it was so respected that it was miraculously allowed to build a temple in communist East Germany before the wall came down-Yet Romney is a MORMON, and surely a MORMON cannot be President.

Romney's church teaches that the constitution is a divinely inspired document and that this nation was established by the God of Heaven. Such respect for our nation and it's founding document can make just another politician into a statesman-Yet Romney is a MORMON, and surely a MORMON cannot be President.
Romney's religious organization teaches love and compassion for all human beings and provides millions of dollars in aid to many countries. It also sent thousands of volunteers to aid Katrina victims in our own country. That aid is given freely, without regard to the religious preference of the recipients-Yet Romney is a MORMON, and surely a MORMON cannot be President.
Wait a minute. What is it about being Mormon that disqualifies Mitt Romney from being an effective president? It is true that there may be theological differences that exist between Romney and others, but he is not running for Bishop, Rabbi, Pope, Minister, Imam, or Pastor. He is running for President.

Thursday, June 14, 2007

You gatta Watch This.......

http://www.glumbert.com/media/shift

Makes you think!

Mark Towner

Republicans Can Have Fun!


Here be Captain Mark and his wench Carrie




Captain "Mustang Mark" Towner
Carrie Towner, Senate District 2 Chair
Utah Attorney General "Black Mark" Shurtleff
Senate President "Long John" Valentine
With the latest "taxes" collected from Fort Jordan Commons

Wednesday, June 13, 2007

Angus Reid Global Monitor : Polls & ResearchRepublicans 2008: Giuliani 27%, McCain at 19%


Angus Reid Global Monitor : Polls & Research
Republicans 2008: Giuliani 27%, McCain at 19%
June 13, 2007

(Angus Reid Global Monitor) - Public support for Rudy Giuliani dropped in the race for the Republican Party’s presidential nomination in the United States, according to a poll by Ipsos-Public Affairs released by the Associated Press. 27 per cent of respondents would back the former New York City mayor in a primary, down eight points since March.


Full Details:



Captain Mark

MITT VS. FACT: Shifting Positions On Abortion


The Gloves come off in the GOP Race

For Immediate Release
Contact: Matt David
Wednesday, June 13, 2007
703-650-5550

SHIFTING POSITIONS ON ABORTION
"Mitt Romney's biggest challenge in this election will be convincing Republicans he has principled positions on important issues, especially now that it's known that he remained committed to pro-choice policies after his 'epiphany' on abortion in 2004. In stark contrast, John McCain has a consistent 24 year pro-life record." - Matt David, Deputy Communications Director

MITT: Mitt Romney maintains that he changed his position on abortion to pro-life after a "single revelatory moment" in November 2004.
VS.
FACT: A new video shows Mitt Romney, just six months after his so-called epiphany, declaring himself "absolutely committed" to supporting pro-choice laws. (YOUTUBE VIDEO: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FxV-QNXoRIc)

BACKGROUND:
Romney Says He Converted To Pro-Life Cause In November 2004, Saying That After That Time He Was Compelled To "Stand For The Dignity Of Human Life"
Romney "Simply Changed His Mind" On Abortion One Day In November 2004. "On abortion, Romney says he simply changed his mind. He recalls that it happened in a single revelatory moment, during a Nov. 9, 2004, meeting with an embryonic-stem-cell researcher who said he didn't believe therapeutic cloning presented a moral issue because the embryos were destroyed at 14 days. 'It hit me very hard that we had so cheapened the value of human life in a Roe v. Wade environment that it was important to stand for the dignity of human life,' Romney says." (Karen Tumulty, "What Romney Believes," Time, 5/21/07)

The Doctor, Harvard's Douglas Melton, Claimed Romney "Mischaracterized My Position." "Governor Romney has mischaracterized my position; we didn't discuss killing or anything related to it. ... I explained my work to him, told him about my deeply held respect for life, and explained that my work focuses on improving the lives of those suffering from debilitating diseases." (Scott Helman, "Romney's Journey To The Right," The Boston Globe, 12/17/06)
Romney: "When I First Ran For Office ... I Concluded, Wrongly, That I Would Support The Law As It Was In Place ... And So I Publicly Acknowledged My Error, And Joined With You To Promote The Sanctity Of Human Life." "As you know, when I first ran for office ... I concluded, wrongly, that I would support the law as it was in place - effectively, a pro-choice position. ... And I was wrong. And so I publicly acknowledged my error, and joined with you to promote the sanctity of human life. And you know that my words were matched with my actions." (Mitt Romney, Remarks To Massachusetts Citizens For Life Mother's Day Dinner, Agawam, MA, 5/10/07)

Six Months After His So-Called Epiphany, Romney Said He Was "Absolutely Committed" To Maintaining Pro-Choice Laws In Massachusetts
Romney In May 2005: "I am absolutely committed to my promise to maintain the status quo with regards to laws relating to abortion and choice and so far I've been able to successfully do that and my personal philosophical views about this issue is not something that I think would do anything other than distract from what I think is a more critical agenda ..." (Mitt Romney, Remarks At Press Conference, 5/27/05)
· Watch

Mitt Romney Say He Was "Absolutely Committed" To Maintaining Pro-Choice Laws Six Months After So-Called Epiphany On Abortion.

Today, Romney Says "As Governor I Came Down On The Side Of Life"
Romney In May 2007: "You don't have to take my word for it. You can look at what I did as a governor. And as a governor I came down on the side of life." (Fox News' "Hannity & Colmes," 5/7/07)