Wednesday, January 10, 2007

NOT Enough Troops to secure the border's


This is not what is needed. We need 500,000 incountry to secure the border and allow the Iraqi military to take control inside their own country. We need to move our troops out of the cities and let these people decide for themselves what is best. We just need to keep the outside influences away, and dry up the arms.


Bush to order about 20,000 more troops to Iraq
By Steve Holland 45 minutes ago
President George W. Bush will tell skeptical Americans on Wednesday he will send 21,500 more U.S. troops to Iraq as part of a long-delayed new plan for the unpopular war, setting up a confrontation with Democrats.
The fresh infusion of troops will join about 130,000 already in Iraq. Senior administration officials said 17,500 would go to Baghdad and 4,000 to volatile Anbar province.
The first wave of troops are expected to arrive in five days, with others coming in additional waves. Under the plan, the Iraqi government will deploy additional Iraqi troops to Baghdad with a first brigade deploying February 1 and two more by February 15.
Senior administration officials said the cost of the troop increase would be around $5.6 billion.
An additional $1.2 billion would finance a rebuilding and jobs programs.
Democratic leaders of the U.S. Congress say they plan to hold symbolic votes in the House of Representatives and the Senate on Bush's plan, which will force the president's Republicans to take a stand on the proposal in an attempt to isolate the president politically over his handling of the war.
They also could try to cut funding for the revised war strategy, but so far Democratic leaders have shied away from threats to do that, although some would like to do so.
(Additional reporting by Caren Bohan, Kristin Roberts, Susan Cornwell and Jeremy Pelofsky)

2007 The Year of the voucher for Choice in Education


I have been following a national trend since the DC for choice got vouchers. The sky didn’t fall, the world didn’t stop spinning, and more and more reasons for not allowing vouchers continue to go up in flames. I never liked the TTC for many reasons, but mainly not every parent could take advantage of the credit, especially middle class working parents.
Plain and simple, vouchers level the playing field for everybody. Parents should be able to decide what school environment is best for their children. This will be the year of the Voucher for Utah, and like many other issues we will lead out on this issue. NCLB was a failure, but Republican legislators’ didn’t want the Bush administration coming down on their necks, so they punted.
Not anymore, voters are ready for change and the old tactic of legislators leaving a committee meeting to take "an important call" just before a vote on the record will not be tolerated.
Money is no longer an issue, and we no longer have a Governor who says he will veto any voucher legislation.Here are some very compelling statistics and up to date information on vouchers.
For specific background, laws, participation rates, and other statistical academic information click on the state.
These are the Hot states: AZ, CO, LA, OH, UT, and WI
About the State Profiles

Mark Towner,The Political Spyglass